OK Doug
The problem with your first link
“Failing EVTOL Companies”
Was that a Google AI generated response gave you what you wanted. good. If that’s what you really wanted.
But consider , What happens to that same search term if you switch just the word failing into the word successful?
Oh Sh£%
You get a similar set of companies which now seem very successful.
(At least at raising funds)
I truly don’t understand why you persist in calling everyone stupid Doug.
Surely slating everyone on the forum with sloganeering is below you.
We shared many documents on this forum and previous ones about EVTOL specifics and requirements. Commercially viable EVTOL is a F$£%^*g hard challenge, we all know that.
Waay harder than the Clean Technica doc starts hinting at.
We’d all benefit by keeping the chat in the technical domain thanks
I still think anyone would be daft to bet against Mark Moore (Whisper Aero)
This Centrifugally Stiffened Rotor is still one of my favourite papers years later…
https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/moore_2013_phi_eternalflight_-_tagged.pdfa