Disruptive Innovation

I of course agree with always questioning everything. We’re trying to do applied science or engineering so we always want to prove ourselves wrong:

If out of 3000 raw ideas only 1 proves to have some success, like the study I linked to earlier says, someone able to point out the drawbacks of ideas is worth their weight in gold.

That person still has to be specific though, and in applied science be able to, for example, suggest experiments, discuss previous research (and link to it), or point to laws of physics that are relevant.

The more specific the questions and answers, the more useful.

2 Likes