Land Use Under AWES Operations

[PierreB]

@Windy_Skies

you don’t analyze the problem

It is only your opinion. My arguments are reasoned and set out above. If you want to refute them, take the trouble to expose them one by one with your rebuttal. I am waiting to see.

@Windy_Skies

you give an unimaginative solution to the problem

Describe what you call my “unimaginative solution to the problem”, by inserting not truncated quotes. For the moment I see nothing but unsupported opinions.

@Windy_Skies

and then claim because your unimaginative solution probably won’t work dealing with these risks is not possible

Quote the not truncated passage.

@Windy_Skies

That you can’t imagine a solution to a problem doesn’t mean that no one else can either.

It is only your opinion. I related several times some solutions. Refer to them.

@Windy_Skies

If you need to be right before you move, you will never win. Perfection is the enemy of the good… Speed trumps perfection…

I don’t care. These are generalities, not more.

@Windy_Skies

In new product development or start-up culture

You do not understand that AWE is not just a start-up.

@PierreB

@PierreB

For another risk such like wing sets with tethers dragging for tens kilometers

I addressed that.

No, the initial sentence is from @JoeFaust:

@JoeFaust

Breakaway wing sets with tethers could fall/drag for tens of kilometers and more;

Then you put this:

@Windy_Skies

[b]reakaway wing sets with tethers could fall/drag for tens of kilometers and more

Then I put it again but within some context you ignored by truncating the passage:

@PierreB

For another risk such like wing sets with tethers dragging for tens kilometers, thus largely leaving the reserved and exclusive area, it is another concern linked to the conception of the AWES.

To resume you should indicate what is the problem I evoked, then my “unimaginative solution”, supporting your opinion by not truncated quotes.