Questions and complaints about moderation + unlisted, mostly unmoderated, free discussion

[PierreB]

Not to mention his propensity to lend others imaginary intentions to support his statements. An example:

@kitefreak

Pierre complained that he does not support your censorship in his name, but you continue to do it.

Another example:

@kitefreak

For all these reasons, soft kites are the COTS TRL9 solution to AWE’s aeroelasticity problem, a limit formally posed in papers like this example from TUDelft-

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326954168_Aeroelastic_Analysis_of_a_Large_Airborne_Wind_Turbine

This statement is also purposely false.

And false statements like these can be found in spades. A mention like “factually untrue” by moderation on his messages would be desirable, even if that would lead to a significant work, but also to significant improvement for the reader.