Questions and complaints about moderation + unlisted, mostly unmoderated, free discussion

[Windy_Skies]

My comment on your comment was:

@Windy_Skies

I’m assuming you’re being sarcastic here. That makes the whole topic even less comprehensible.

I’m iffy on the whole topic. It’s incomprehensible to me and I don’t think there’s much wrong with my reading comprehension. Communicate better @JoeFaust. I suggest trying to communicate one idea at a time and like you were talking to a 7-year-old.

For example:

@JoeFaust

What to do with fractal turbulence and ever-changing tensile couplings while converting energy from forms to other forms? What to do with layered arrays of continuities and discontinuities? Getting resultants from uncertainties? With wild waves and broad-spectrum of frequencies? Mining irregular flows? Interaction between the various wing sets coupled to other wing sets in kite arrays? (kite as trinity of wing sets with tether set as a wing set coupling other wing sets within ever-changing media; K:: {W1,Wt,W2. M})

I don’t know how many ideas this is, but it’s too many for the number of words used. It’s too dense. And we’re not on your wavelength.

That researchers should always be on the lookout for analogues is good advice. Yes perhaps bees can teach us something about lightweight construction. But if you want to be helpful to us you’ll have to do more than just mention an idea in a list, you’ll have to expand on it a little. Show us a nice video about bees making honeycombs for example.

And no one is going to click 20 links. 4 is my maximum.