I’m going to respond here, because in addition to being irrelevant, your comment is completely off topic. There is therefore no point in overloading the concerned topic which may be of interest.
A time more…
As I indicated several times, almost all wrote about the piston, questioning its usefulness.
You want to be the Mike Barnard of AWE. But MikeB is consistent, unlike you. He doesn’t believe in AWE (thinking that the intelligence of researchers is an indication of AWE’s ineffectiveness), nor in unconventional wind turbines. In fact, he’s hardly said a word about them for some time. You, on the other hand, have been spouting insults and complaints on the old and new AWE forums for years, while being ambiguous about believing in AWE. It’s amusing for a while, but tiresome in the long run.