It is the first time I (and someone) evoked the natural severe limit of scaling of torque transfer devices due to the catenary sag effect which aggravates mass scaling penalty, leading to mass x shaft length penalty.
This is a simple fact from the real world.
You cannot justify your statement. I know lenticular ballons since 2010 and also I repeat I posted a comment about them, without any reaction from you, of type “it is my invention”.
You indicates to me a manufacturer of balloons which are not really lenticular balloons (http://www.skydocballoon.com/), on February 11, 2023, so far after my comment mentioned just above, and more than 10 years after I knew lenticular airships: see my knowledge of lenticular airships by Pierre Balaskovic in Royan 2010. And these balloons are not rotors including lenticular balloons like I invented, being able to prove the date (January 2022). You cannot prove anything about the invention of a rotor including a lenticular balloon, just evoking some "thoughts ".
Without any support, and claimed (privately or publicly) after my comments on this forum.
I knew that the inventors’ imagination was at work, but not to this extent, as for the following of your comment. You should write novels.
You have the wrong view on the catenary sag effect; it doesn’t prevent energy production as such, but it does prevent reaching altitude and scaling, unless perhaps you implement my type of rotor including a lenticular balloon.