Unlike here, the comments under the video have some insights. For example:
The biggest turbine (type MySE 16-260) of the China Three Gorges Corporation has a max power rating of 16 Megawatts and are designed to operate in tropic storms that are occuring yearly in the South China Sea. The turbine remains operable at wind speeds up to 79,8 meters per second or 287 km/h. The efficiency of the turbine is nearing 90% of the Betz’s coefficient (max achievable extraction of wind power by a wind turbine, is 59.3% in accordance with Betz law).
It would be interesting to see the efficiency of the one blade turbine mentioned in the video.Their is no way a turbines OPERATES in winds that fast, they mearly survive them. All turbines have a cutout speed where they apply brakes and stop turning. What your quoting is the wind speed which would overwhelm and utterly destroy the turbine. Fortunatly it is a speed well above even catagory 5 hurricane winds and is only a little below the highest hurricane speed ever recorded a 96 m/s so if the engineering is accurate it is a very durable turbine.
Doug comments:
Neal: The reason nearly all small wind turbine companies have gone out of business is solar prices suddenly dropped tenfold. Wind turbines of any size have to be built to last 20 years. is your car alternator going to spin for 20 years of continuous driving? No, and imagine how long it would last if you were to drive your car 24 hours a day,. Maybe your car alternator would last 6 months? And the alternator operates under controlled conditions, whereas wind storms can easily force ten times the rated power onto a wind turbine. Wind turbines can be ripped apart by sudden high gusts, shredded by hail, abraded by rain or even dust in the air, oscillated and vibrated to death in gusts or whenever any imbalance might occur . And your turbine needs a tall, very strong support structure. And cabling - buried. And disconnect switches. And a charge controller with batteries, or grid-tie inverter. And someone has to install all that, and they need to know what they are doing. Meanwhile, you can buy cheap turbines on Ebay - here’s one for $145: 1200W Wind Turbine Generator Kit 5 Blades Windmill DC 12/24V Charger Controller 241364504197 | eBay How long would it last? How much power would it make? Hard to say, but at that price, best to make sure you don’t put it into a truly strong wind. Good turbines cost a lot more, due to requiring rare earth magnets, since a car alternator would have trouble producing a charging voltage at the relatively low RPM of a wind turbine, and they need to b super-sensitive for light winds, and yet super-strong for high winds. Not easy.
If Darius VAWTs are mostly held back by bearing challenges with one blade passing through the tower shadow, surely this has that issue? …and gyro loads from adjusting for gusts and from waves! 200m blade seems unlikely to me. However, small scale deployment might be cheap enough even with ruggedised bearings if the higher winds and reduced wake claims are valid. Certainly a fresh idea anyway…
Uneven forces on the rotor bearing may be less of a problem when the mast isn’t cemented into the ground but designed to bob around on the waves - where the top of the mast can just translate sideways as a result of rythmic sideways forces. I wonder if the main problem is indeed sideways forces, because you’d still have the same problem with “sideways” rotational moments.
I think you misunderstood. The issue is that a rotating turbine is a gyroscope. Think of a normal wind turbine. If the wind changes direction, it has to yaw to face the wind (as a wind from the side wouldn’t be useful). If the turbine is rotating and yawing at the same time, the gyroscopic effect will twist the turbine either up or down depending on the direction if it has 3 (or more) blades. If it has only 2 blades, the same thing happens except the strength of the gyroscopic effect varies. It’s strongest when the blades are in vertical position and the weakest when they’re in the horizontal position. This varying gyroscopic effect rattles the tower can causes it to wear out faster than otherwise.
That’s technically a two bladed turbine, designed as a single blade, which doesn’t give any significant benefit, but a lot of disadvantages. Conventional pitch control isn’t very problematic, and has multiple significant to huge advantages over tilting the whole construction. The “uniblade” design makes the issues with making and transporting big turbines with that design as bad as conventional turbine designs with twice the rotor diameter,
Will the wind be directed downwards? Sure, typically yes, slightly at least. Will that increase net power generation compared to just utilizing the wind in the best ways we know, and/or decrease cost of the power generated? Definitely no! There’s no free lunch in physics, if you redirect the flow you’re not utilizing the energy in the wind as efficiently as you could have, and can’t “gather” and focus airflow from way above the turbines that way.
why is it almost at sea level? the winds is up not down there
The export voltage is 66kV or 132kV - for a 15MW turbine that means current is pretty low so losses at anticipated distances from shore will be manageable. Larger offshore wind parks will only be running 10’s of kilometres to an offshore substation where the voltage can be transformed even higher to efficiently transport to shore