The situation with Daisy Network turbine systems is.
I’ve built and tested prototypes from home.
I’m in a position where I am now going to attempt a portable EV charging kite turbine system.
That’s a result.
We could replicate that.
But we can better it.
A video recap.
Next paragraph is a personal gripe. You can skip it.
This doesn’t need basic research to become a viable venture.
Have you seen Kiwee one analysed in a basic science text? No.
Not here https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/642682/results
Yet the funding was for a comprehensive analysis of AWES. That hasn’t happened.
AWESCO missed oportunities to analyse alternate AWES design arrangements.
The flaw is on the first paragraph on the funding page
https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/642682
Power is generated either by periodically pulling a ground based generator via a winch, or by small wind turbines mounted on the kite that exploit its fast cross wind motion.
Horse shite.
In the topic Land Use Under AWES Operations [quote=“Windy_Skies, post:20, topic:1257”]
iterate fast .
[/quote]
ITERATE FAST – This is IMO what AWESCO should do ASAP.
For now, I’m still working from home. If you’re in AWESCO and you’re working from home, you can do this too.
Yes, there are loads of improvements to make on Kite turbines.
You can collaborate on this project. You can collaborate on others too.
Here’s the choice : to work on the best performing, safest, most scalable AWES out : or not.
Products can be made and sold with training to early adopters.