If you have a few hours, here is some discussion about forum moderation after the rule was put into place:
You’re arguing from a non-existent or barely existent hypothetical.
The rule applies to things like this:
This is a definite statement of fact, without qualifiers, and nothing to back it up. Subsequent questioning of this reveals you are using your own definitions of AWE and commercial viability that are not shared by the vast majority of people in the field.
If you had instead written: I think AWE is already commercially viable (just look how well toy kites are selling).