Questions and complaints about moderation + unlisted, mostly unmoderated, free discussion

[PierreB]

@kitefreak

Not much third party value to worry about, no one replied to Analytic KIte Philosophy topic and Cosine Functions feedback was mostly objection to using “cosine gain” as defined.

You are wrong.
What is this (kite philosophy topic)?

The Philosopher's Kite

Here is an abstract of Paul Ricoeur’s conferences about " The Later Wittgenstein and the Later Husserl on Language". https://ricoeur.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/ricoeur/article/view/245. As Wittgenstein’s analytic philosophy was different if not opposite to Husserl’s phenomenology, it would be interesting to know the philosophical and mathematical path of Ludwig towards the kite. By the reverse, I saw an example of an application of some phenomenological concepts: for US design patent the applican…

What is that (cosine topic)?

Cosine Functions in Kite Physics

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299537884_Crosswind_Kite_Power_with_Tower 18.2 Cosine Efficiency and its Maximization, 18.2.4 Numerical Results, page 449: “Even if the tower height is only half of the kite’s altitude, an efficiency gain of up to 1.89 in case C is possible.”

And

Cosine Functions in Kite Physics

I have to disagree. For what I saw “efficiency gain” expression is used, and not “Cosine Efficiency Gain” as such. However the used words are in 18.2.4 subsection which is a part of 18.2 section whose title is Cosine Efficiency and its Maximization as I precised in my previous message. So one hardly can doubt that “efficiency gain” refers to “Cosine Efficiency”. So the concept of cosine gain is used in the book. Another quote on the same page 449: " However, as visualized in Fig. 18.7, a consi…

And

Cosine Functions in Kite Physics

I did it just previously on: And also: https://link.springer.com/search?facet-eisbn=978-981-10-1947-0&facet-content-type=Chapter&query=cosine+gain

Delete your posts if you want, but not posts from “third party”.