So I see two possible benefits for utility scale AWE
 Access to high altitude winds
 Less material use
I think only the second one makes much sense, the first one I consider a perk.
The power output of a wind power plant is very dependent on \frac{C_L^3}{C_D^2} (lift coefficient times glide ratio squared). For a HAWT, the same can be expressed by tip speed ratio TSR. But for windmills there is a max TSR possible because you will eventually be hitting the Betz limit (or in other words the wake of the blade in front).
This I believe is the biggest Â«breakÂ» for AWE, considering all added complications AWE entails. There is no max limit to glide ratio for AWE in terms of swept area diameter. because you can so easily just expand the diameter to accomodate a higher TSR/glide number.
This, if you are with me so far, means that utility scale AWE should focus on higher glide numbers. This is already quite difficult as HAWT have laid the bare really high. But maybe
2 Likes
Yes. A high number can be achieved in two ways, possibly by combining them:

The â€śusualâ€ť way, being a high lifttodrag ratio

A very high lift coefficient as for Flettner (until 8 at a spin ratio of 3 or 4) or Sharp (until 3) rotors, or as for High lift coefficient and biplane kite, the last being able to be combined with the previous (high lifttodrag ratio).
2 Likes
How about steadier and more consistent winds?
It is a perk, but the cost of tether drag kills your performance. So you would always want the minimum tether. The minimum tether would normally be decided by ground clearance, turning abilities, path shape, reel out length in a cycle etc
1 Like
The minimum length tether moving with the kite. You could have a central tether with multiple quick moving tethers branching off from it.
And if tether drag kills your performance with single kite designs so you canâ€™t access the higher altitude, more consistent winds and there is therefore also less opportunity for dual use of the land youâ€™re on, certainly much less than with HAWTs, that kind of kills your hope of staying on land if you want to go bigger  which is the entire point of the exercise , so you have no option but to go offshore, which is the opposite of derisking or cheap.
Any multiple kites on a single tether or something not moving crosstether of course is another story. Though my definition seems to cover the most popular options these days.