If you prefer only (1.5 MW) 90 m span for only 330 m tether length, comprising the 98 m for each reel-out/in phase, or even (1.5 kW) 9 m span for 33 m tether length comprising 10 m reeling. As I indicated several times the tether length should not be too high compared to the kite span or the swept area. Even Makani 600 kW is too small compared to its space use. And Google and others will not give a second chance so easily. So a credible method allowing scaling NOW is required.
Other than that, I think I can do without your remarks on figure 12.14, remarks which has little to do with the subject. The only thing to note about this figure is the substantially equal duration of the power and recovery phases which could confirm a rate of climb equal to that of the descent that I mentioned for a classical kite it is true.