I should have said in an encyclopedia entry, or things like a resource of shared knowledge.
Are you not trying to create an encyclopedia entry? It seems like you kind or are:
You have now added misinformation. Lorum ipsum would have been better, or you can do the strike through thing until you’ve found sources. I know there is software that lets you do an exact text search on files in a folder or computer, so that should be doable if the AI didn’t hallucinate. Maybe by now there is software that lets you do fuzzy search.
One of the first things I would expect to see in a Ground Stations encyclopedic entry would be a summary of realized ground stations, and ones conceptualized in peer reviewed papers. In a perfect world each ground station mentioned there would link to its own detailed page. That detailed page would also be linked from the page on the system that the ground station was a part of, and so on and so on.
That was probably edited mainly by Joe Faust. I’d classify his Wikipedia edits as vandalism too. You can just go in and make corrections or create new pages. You’re creating the same problem here, a potential visitor doesn’t know what to trust or not because everything is unsourced, and a potential contributor is confronted with the same.
Stop it with the fast tracking already >_>