As I repeat, there is no “empirical data” on the publication in question. It’s “empirical correction,” which is not at all the same thing.
Empirical Correction of a Dynamical Model. Part I: Fundamental Issues in: Monthly Weather Review Volume 127 Issue 11 (1999)
I’ve already corrected this error: there’s no point in repeating it; it won’t become a truth, regardless of the argument used.