Questions about Moderation

[PierreB]

@Rodread

You’re right
The optimised trpt system proposed in the PhD calculation is unworkable. It wouldn’t be very unstable with those gaps. It would be nowhere near as heavy as you suggest.

This whole argument is pointless however
There is no point in just lengthening the TRPT as a way to scale the power of a kite turbine.
That’s just a nonsensical proposal.

Yet you have claimed this “nonsensical proposal” on three successive comments.
I only repeated the data mentioned by yourself on the third one, as it highlights the catenary sag effect penalty by “lengthening the TRPT” (your terms) :

SuperTurbine (tm) and Serpentine, and other torque transfer systems

The optimisations continue and they spit out Rotor radius 2.22m Blade length 1.4m TRPT radius 0.5m TRPT section lengths 1.25m Elevation angle 18.5 TRPT total length 190m Tip speed ratio 3.5 This results in an operating altitude of 60m, far beyond the operating height of a HAWT with a power output of a few kW.

“The optimisations continue and they spit” is now becoming a “nonsensical proposal”, isn’t it?

Note that my last question concerned any model of Daisy you want, not necessary the model page 227 if you don’t like it anymore.

But maybe the problem comes from myself, the English language not being my native language. I am certainly unable to discern the subtleties that may exist behind the contradictions I have just pointed out, surely to a fault.

From all this it appears that I am perhaps not able to distinguish what is technical in your contributions, for example this one:

SuperTurbine (tm) and Serpentine, and other torque transfer systems

Thanks @PierreB Yeah it’s been pretty hard to stay cool with all the laugher. Tres amusant. No need to be En Garde But I may need a corset to stop my sides splitting. You almost convinced me that you believe the 40 year old hype. You know what falls down? Your argument. It’s got no logical flow. Your analysis has been nit picking tiny disconnected details and threading them together in a fantasy narrative. Highly amusing but not useful to anyone. keep trying

There are probably some hidden technical ideas: could you please reveal them?

I’m going to quote another message that seems to sum it all up in a concise way, so that everyone can benefit from the technical treasure you’ll be able to reveal:

@Rodread

Are you conveniently ignoring everything else but some playground argument point yet again
Fuck off
Until you have a genuinely useful reply

Unfortunately my English is not good enough to appreciate this message to its full extent. Can you reveal the secret code opening the technical quintessence so that everyone can benefit from it? Thanks.